More Pages: Morton Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43


Serves as an Introduction to Eleven Presidents
Mostly Very Good Histories of Top Presidents1)Abraham Lincoln
2)Franklin D. Roosevelt
3)George Washington
4)Theodore Roosevelt
5)Thomas Jefferson
Another national study I read found the same results, except with FDR and Washington switching places.
I disagree with the premise that Grover Cleveland and Harry S. Truman deserve to be ranked with these great Presidents. You can also make a case for ranking Adams, Jackson, and Wilson below other presidents.
I do think they rank above the mixed records of the most recent Presidents of Jimmy Carter (peacemaker but troubled economy and Iran), Ronald Reagan (cold war warrior but massive budget deficits for handouts to top 1%), George Bush (successful coalition against Iraq but massive budget deficits and no direction), and Bill Clinton (balanced budget and strong economic policy but sex and pardon scandals).
James K. Polk belongs ranked below them all.


Is China too big of a subject for a short book?
It has very good facts

[Lot's of money] for PDFs?!It's clear the item is a CD; it's not clear that it's only readable as PDFs. Sure, it's reasonable to argue this format is suitable for web designers. However, type "Web Design" in the www.Amazon.com search engine and links to 2,644 books appear. Nearly all web design books I've purchased come with a CD. It's not an outrageous assumption to expect both.
I may be old school, but 400+ pages of PDFs leave me cold and visually impaired. Even if production costs are considered, I expect CDs of this kind and cost to be somewhat more interactive than just staring at a radiating screen. When CD-ROMs my children find in their cereal boxes allow them to direct the action on their computer, CD costs can't be that high.
In addition, we're told we're saving [money] because we agree to buy the four-file set. Save more of your money and buy a discount art history book dealing with Italian Renaissance masters. If you have trouble deciphering the figures, get a dictionary of symbols, buy a couple of Carl Jung (Man and His Symbols) or Joseph Campbell (Hero with a Thousand Faces) books, or just read glossy magazines. Also, the other 13 books listed on www.Amazon.com dealing with web color are [not very expensive].
I will use it, but its format and cost leave me with remorse.
From an amateur to an expert within no time!A.Masood


Review of HudackIt is very extensive information wise, almost overwhelming.
An excelent and easy to read text for critical care nursing

Good introductory book to dream interpretation.
Dreams: An important process, for growth to inner life.

Good for BeginnersIntermediate level to elite skiers could take issue with many of the technical explainations, for then I would suggest "Ski "Skating with Champions" or "Tao of Skiing" but the then, the book "Essential Cross-Country Skier" was written by someone who obviously loves the sport and will be enjoyed by those who want to take it up.
The Essential Cross-Country Skier: A Step-By-Step Guide

Helpful for my Lit class. Book VERY POORLY MADE!!!I am VERY,VERY disapointed in the overall quality of the book. DON'T BUY THE PAPER BACK EDITION. Get it in hard back if you can. With my copy of this book, as well as, the copies that belonged to several other members of my Lit. class, the binding broke and the book fell apart. Now I can't resell it.
Another Great Anthology Literature

A Study In Self-deceptionThe Schneirs wanted to believe that the Rosenbergs were innocent, framed by the U.S. Govt. They wrote a book that 'proved' their case -- if you didn't know enough about the Rosenberg affair to make an independent judgement, and didn't think well enough to see through their predjudices and pre-conceptions.
The Schneirs basic method is twofold: One: when presented with a complex case, select only the evidence that supports the story you're pushing; Two: when nothing to help you is available, make it up. Examples: an exchange that goes on for several pages in the trial transcript, involving the judge, two lawyers, and a witness, that ends with the judge ruling against the defense but saying that the defense lawyers can bring up the subject again tomorrow, when they have the transcript of that day's proceedings [something the defense chose not to do], is reduced to ONE sentence, designed to show a prejudice by the judge that isn't there; when trying to explain how the investigation of the Rosenbergs started, they claim, on no evidence, that Hoover believed in Soviet atomic espionage because he thought the Russians were too stupid to build the bomb on their own (actually, it was because decrypted messages proved the former USSR [oh! how I love to type "former USSR"!] had spies in the Manhattan Project, but those messages were the U.S. Govt.'s biggest 'secret', known only to the FBI, NSA, and KGB).
In the seventies, the FBI released its files on the Rosenbergs, allowing anyone with the will to see that they'd been guilty. The Schneirs refused to see. In the Nineties, the National Security Agency declassified the Venona files . The Schneirs finally threw in the towel and admitted what had been obvious for decades: Julius Rosenberg spied for the Soviet Union.
If you are writing the history of a controversial subject, I recommend this book as an example of how to go wrong. If you're interested in what really happened in the Rosenberg Case, get THE ROSENBERG FILE by Ronald Radosh and Joyce Milton, in print and available.
The Best Book on the Subject.

Not Blum's best work!The first few chapters were good but the book steadily went downhill from there. Theodore Roosevelt was such a lively, exciting character and Blum's book did not bring out any of that excitement. I found the book informative but very boring and dull.
Roosevelt as Progressive ConservativeIt shows how much difference one man can make to both his political party and to his nation. The book was written at a time when the legacy of Teddy Roosevelt was very much in the shadow of FDRoosevelt's new deal. It provides an intense contrast with the current, sorry state of the Republican party and national politics, in general.


This book ends prematurely
The Compleat Stanley
Overall this work, and the early edition, serve as worthwhile overviews of the presidencies and presidents covered. But this book is NOT a factual reserve to be used for heavy-duty reference. It's much more aptly considered as an INTRODUCTION to eleven US presidents. I used it, along with other titles, to study for the AP US History exam. For that goal it is useful, and thus I gave it 3 stars (3 stars is "useful"; I am a 'hard grader'). I haven't read many other books like it, though, and cannot compare it to other like-minded titles-- so there may well be a more modern resource better suited to an individual's scholarly needs. You'd have to browse around on Amazon.com and check that out.
Sidenote: I liked the initial three chapters on Washington, Adams, and Jefferson. Since they all served in a row (1888-1808), the three chapters read in a row really convey a sense of the period (which may be lacking as the book later skips ahead 20 or 30 years to reach the new president). I especially remember the efforts to which all three presidents went to keep us out of foreign entanglements. Great presidents indeed.